{"id":975,"date":"2021-02-12T02:11:08","date_gmt":"2021-02-12T02:11:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cienciacuantica.org\/de\/?p=975"},"modified":"2021-02-15T12:27:49","modified_gmt":"2021-02-15T12:27:49","slug":"penta-hexa-der-schopfung","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cienciacuantica.org\/en\/2021\/02\/12\/penta-hexa-der-schopfung\/","title":{"rendered":"PENTA-HEXA of Creation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

PENTA-HEXA of Creation: the theory about microcosm and macrocosm.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
The precise depiction of the PENTA-HEXA DNA of creation.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Alexander Philipp A\u00dfmus – through his definition of the two ways of creation (video below), is the first ever to depict the \u00a9 “Penta-Hexa of Creation” precisely, that is with the three circles, without a vertical line inside the Vesica Piscis and without the two diagonal lines crossing the center (image above).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not only is his argumentation, that by creation, the Pentagon appears already with the second circle, and that the Hexagon can only appear with the third circle. But furthermore, Alexander Philipp argues: it indicates that the Pentagon represents the macrocosm or heavens, and the Hexagon represents the microcosm or earth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Penta-Hexa of Creation: \u00a9Alexander Philipp A\u00dfmus.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

This is the case because the microcosm was created out of the macrocosm (the solar system existed before earth existed) and the microcosm forms part of the macrocosm (earth forms part of the solar system). Therefore, it makes sense that both geometries, the Pentagon and the Hexagon exist on earth, as for example in our DNA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But the hypothesis can be checked by asking if the Hexagon can be found in the Macrocosm, that is in the skies of the solar system or in the next macro-level outside the solar system. On one hand we know from the theory of fractality (Beno\u00eet Mandelbrot\/ Dan Winter), that everything, the small gets smaller and the big gets bigger infinitely. Does this mean that the Hexagon should be found in the macrocosm as well? Maybe it depends on the level of the observer and maybe even on the perspective of the observer? Is it, that the Hexagon can only be found from the same level of the observer towards the micro-levels? That is: on a planet from the solar system\/ similar galaxy and smaller?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A first approach to find this out would be the question if the Hexagon can be found in space, or even outside the solar system. We know for example, that there is a huge Hexagon on the north pole of Saturn. Saturn however forms part of the same level, being a planet from the solar system like earth, and it should therefore be considered as microcosm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Saturn’s North Pole: NASA\/JPL-Caltech\/Space Science Institute.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The Pentagon however can be found in the skies of our same solar system, as the Pentagram of Venus, the beautiful geometry formed by Earth and Venus dancing around the sun, which takes 8 years to complete one cycle as observed from earth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Image: John Martineau.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

But there is more evidence: The apple incorporates the five-ness within its womb, but also it has the form of a Torus. We know that the entire universe including all galaxies is formed by an infinite number of connected electromagnetic Tori (Nassim Haramein). Dan Winter (fractalfield.com) confirms this and takes it to another level with his theory of perfect phase-conjugate, self-organizing, fractal compression, which is beautifully explained through his model of the Star-Mother-Kit. Scholars agree that the geometry of the five-pointed star within a star without doubt has to do with infinite fractality in both directions, micro as well as macro. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Image: @mcharlesart<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
@gifer.com (artist unknown).<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Ancient scholars also confirm the hypothesis: Pythagoras himself defined the Dodecahedron as aether, in ancient science known as the material that fills the region of the universe above the terrestrial sphere. If we cannot find a Hexagon in the skies, but maybe find a Hexagon on a planet within another galaxy that is similar to our solar system, this would confirm the theory that the Hexagon only exists within a certain level of creation. This could probably mean that we are living on the sixth level of creation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Does it go all the way up to into oneness? Without doubt geometry is a universal language and as Johannes Keppler said: \u201cGeometry must have existed before creation\u201d. Therefore, we should trust geometrical language as the code of the Universe that directs the significance of our own human existence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Penta-Hexa of Creation:
\u00a9Alexander Philipp A\u00dfmus.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

In order to verify the above mentioned theory, the School of Quantic Science is already in contact with astronomers, a worldwide team of scientists who are in Chile due to the favorable geographical conditions for space observation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00a9 APA \u2013 all rights reserved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n